Yearly journal of scientific articles “Pravova derzhava” Volume 31 (2020), 476-485 p.
Protsenko Iryna. The child right to be heard in court (using the 1980 Hague Convention in Ukraine as an example)
The Hague Convention on Civil Law Aspects of International Child Abduction in 1980 introduced a mechanism for resolving issues related to the illegal export or maintenance of children by persons closely related to them. According to this mechanism, executive and judicial authorities must take measures to quickly return the child to the state of his usual place of residence. However, such a return may be refused if there are circumstances specified in the 1980 Convention. One of these is the court's identification of the child’s objections to his return, however, provided that the child has reached an age and level of maturity at which his opinion should be taken into account. Therefore, the court of Ukraine finds out the opinion of the child only if he considers that he has reached the required age and level of maturity. However, the abstractness of the wording of this circumstance leads to the fact that when considering return cases in Ukrainian courts, the child’s opinion is often not heard unreasonably (for example, if the court considers the child’s age insufficient to clarify his opinion, or because the defendant does not insist on hearing the views of the child, or because the parties fail to provide evidence that the child has reached the required age and level of maturity).
In our opinion, the courts, in order to avoid such errors, should more actively implement the stipulated in Art. 13 of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine the right, on its own initiative, to collect evidence regarding the subject of the dispute, in particular, by appointing a psychological examination aimed at determining the level of development of the child. Clarification of the views of the child should also be carried out with mandatory consideration of the provisions of Article 12 of the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which governs the right of a child to be heard. At the same time, it is worth introducing into the judicial practice of Ukraine the approaches enshrined in the Comments of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child of General Order ¹ 12 (2009) “The Right of the Child to be Heard”, in particular, related to assessing the child’s ability to express his thoughts
Key words: Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 25 October 1980, child's objections to return, child's right to be heard.
References
1. Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 25 October 1980. URL : https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=24. 2. Status Table. Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. URL : https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=24. 3. Explanatory Report on the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention by Elis a Pérez-Vera. Offprint from the Acts and Documents of the Fourteenth Session (1980). Tome III «Child abduction». P. 426-476. URL : https://assets.hcch.net/docs/a5fb103c-2ceb-4d17-87e3-a7528a0d368c.pdf. 4. Uzahalnennia praktyky zastosuvannia sudamy pid chas rozghliadu tsyvilnykh sprav Konventsii pro tsyvilno-pravovi aspekty mizhnarodnoho vykradennia ditei : Lyst Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav vid 01 sichnia 2017 r. URL : http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/VRR00216.html. 5. Postanova Sumskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 21 bereznia 2019 r. u spravi ¹ 585/3741/16-ts. URL : http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80653497. 6. Haro H., Babak O. Aktualni problemy ziasuvannia sudom dumky dytyny pry vyrishenni pytan, shcho stosuiutsia yii zhyttia. URL : http://www.hsa.org.ua/blog/aktualni-problemy-z-yasuvannya-sudom-dumky-dytyny-pry-vyrishenni-pytan-shho-stosuyutsya-yiyi-zhyttya/. (ukr) 7. Postanova Verkhovnoho sudu Ukrainy vid 27 liutoho 2019 r. u spravi ¹ 757/25106/16. URL : http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81073263. (ukr) 8. Rishennia Dniprovskoho raionnoho sudu m. Kyieva vid 2 liutoho 2018 r. URL : http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72057268. (ukr) 9. Postanova Sumskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 21 bereznia 2019 r. u spravi ¹ 585/3741/16-ts. URL : http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80653497. (ukr) 10. Ukhvala Dniprovskoho raionnoho sudu m. Kyieva vid 2 lystopada 2017 r. po spravi ¹ 755/12339/17. URL : https://opendatabot.ua/court/70080911-6e558fd4fe2082d9c5cdc6398bae18d8. (ukr) 11. Ukhvala Apeliatsiinoho sudu mista Kyieva vid 13 hrudnia 2017 r. po spravi ¹ 755/12339/17-ts. URL : https://opendatabot.ua/court/71010863-1eda03a371219cd15d971bdd202bdde0. (ukr) 12. Konventsiia OON pro prava dytyny vid 20 lystopada 1989 r. URL : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_021. (ukr) 13. Zamechaniye Komiteta OON po pravam rebenka obshchego poryadka ¹ 12 (2009) «Pravo rebenka byt zaslushannym». URL: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRC%2fC%2fGC%2f12&Lang=ru. (rus).
<< Íàçàä
