Yearly journal of scientific articles “Pravova derzhava” Volume 31 (2020), 190-200 p.
Malyshev Oleksandr. Cultural Heritage in Juridical Realm of Things
Introduction. This article deals with the concepts of cultural heritage and cultural property from the standpoint of legal history and philosophy. This research reflection was inspired by the Draft Law of Ukraine “On Cultural Market Goods”. The author follows the path determined by language and by peculiarities of civil law tradition. It is high time to return to a dialectical understanding of Romance and Germanic traditions as two contradictive poles of heritage law understanding in Continental Europe.
The aim of the article is the analysis of the correlation of “cultural heritage” and “cultural property” notions within international law and national law of Ukraine, and integration of these notions into the united concept of heritage law.
Results. First, the fundamental terms and definitions – for instance, “bien” (French) and “Sache” (German) – related to the property law have been analysed in relevant civil codes of Romance and Germanic traditions. The property law in the civil law tradition provides a certain legal description of the whole visible and abstract world. Hence, the way passed from the Napoleonic Code to the German Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch was both the development of legal forms, as well as the evolution of the world outlook reflected in the legal texts.
In the French Code civil, one can observe a baroque pattern of the world of things, especially manifested by a difficult correlation between “bien” and “chose” concepts. The definition of “Sache” in Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch demonstrates the positivistic world vision. Because Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch is more advanced from the legal drafting methodology, its specific patterns and notions were implemented by the civil codes of the majority of European countries. On the contrary, in the heritage law realm, the Romance “bien” concept has been dominating.
Conclusions. Paper states that the Romance law tradition and, particularly, the French doctrine of the civil law have a determining impact on the roots and on the formation of the modern vision of the cultural property. Hence, such doctrinal foundations seem to be efficient for a systematic and organic comprehension of the heritage law.
Key words: cultural heritage, cultural property, biens culturels, things, property law.
References
1. Khotenko O. Peremishchennia kulturnykh tsinnostei cherez kordon Ukrainy. V chomu problema i de znaity rishennia. // NV Biznes. 8 January 2020. URL : https://nv.ua/ukr/biz/experts/predmeti-mistectva-na-ukrajinskomu-kordoni-chomu-sistema-ne-pracyuye-50063062.html 2. Akulenko V. I. Mizhnarodne pravo okhorony kulturnykh tsinnostei ta yoho implementatsiia u vnutrishnomu pravi Ukrainy : monog. Kyiv, 2013. P. 475–489. 3. Menska O. A. Kulturna spadshchyna yak obiekt tsyvilnykh prav : PhD thesis, spets. : 12.00.03. Kyiv : Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav, 2015. 231 p. 4. Romaniuk A. O. Istorychni ta kulturni tsinnosti yak obiekt tsyvilno-pravovykh vidnosyn : PhD : 12.00.03. Kyiv : Nats. akad. vnutrishnikh sprav. 2015. 233 p. 5. Zverkhovska V. F. Kulturni tsinnosti yak obiekty tsyvilnykh prav : PhD thesis: 12.00.03. Odesa : Natsionalnyi universytet «Odeska yurydychna akademiia», 2015. 212 s. 6. Gaii Institutiones. Ad Codicis Veronensis. / ed. Th. Dydynski. Varsoviae, 1891. P. 18. 8. Frantsuzskyi hrazhdanskyi kodeks 1804 hoda. S pozdneishymy yzmenenyiamy do 1939 h. / perevod Y. S. Pereterskoho. Moskva: Yurydycheskoe yzdatelstvo NKIu SSSR, 1941. S. 148. 9. Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch für die gesammten Deutschen Erbländer der Oesterreichischen Monarchie. II. Theil. Wien : Aus der k. k. Hof und Staatsdruckerei 1811. S. 1. 10. Saujot C. Le droit français de l’archéologie / Deuxieme édition à jour au 1-er septembre 2007. Paris, 2007. P. 171. 11. Código Civil // Gaceta de Madrid. Num. 206. Jueves, 25 Julio 1889. Tomo III. P. 255. 12. Codice civile del Regno d'Italia, corredato della relazione del Ministro Guardasigilli Fatta A. S. M., in udienza del 25 giugno 1865. Torino – Firenze, 1865. P. 79. 13. Codice Civile. Testo approvato con R. decreto 16 marzo 1942-XX, n. 262 // Gazzetta Ufficiale del Regno d’Italia, n. 79. Sabato, 4 aprile 1942. Anno XX. P. 86. 14. Ibid. 15. Decreto legislativo luogotenenziale. 14 settembre 1944, n. 287. Provvedimenti relativi alla riforma della legislazione civile. // Gazzetta Ufficiale del Regno d’Italia, n. 79. Giovedi, 9 novembre 1944. P. 506. 16. Despre distinctia bunurilor (Art. 535–546 – Noul Cod Civil). URL : http://www.euroavocatura.ro/articole/1058/ Despre_distinctia_bunurilor__Art__535_-_546_-_Noul_Cod_Civil_ 17. Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch.... S. 1. 18. Bundesgesetz: Rechtsstellung von Tieren (NR: GP XVII IA 130/A AB 497 S. 53. BR: AB 3447 S. 498.) // Bundesgesetzblatt für die Republik Österreich. Jahrgang 1988. Ausgegeben am 31 März 1988, 62. Stück. S. 1832. 19. Codigo civil portuguez. Approvado por Carta de lei de 1 de julho de 1867. Segunda edição official. Lisboa, 1868. P. 68. 20. Decreto-Lei n. 47 344 : Aprova o Codigo Civil e regula a sua aplicação // Diário do Governo. Sexta-feira 25 de Novembro de 1966. I Série – Número 274. P. 1903. 21. Ibid. 22. Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 3. URL : https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005291/2020-01-01 23. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. Vom 18. August 1896. // Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt. Band 1896. Nr. 21. S. 209 24. Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch vom 10. Dezember 1907. URL : https://www.gesetze.ch/sr/210/210_080.htm 25. See also : Malyshev O. O. Romanska ta hermanska tradytsii arkheolohichnoho prava: sproba uzahalnennia // Pravova derzhava. Vyp. 29. Kyiv, 2018. S. 476–485. 26. Kodex Napoleona z przypisami. Xiąg trzy. Warszawa, 1810. S. 139. 27. Council Regulation (EC) No 116/2009 of 18 December 2008 on the export of cultural goods (Codified version). URL : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009R0116 28. Duranton M. Cours de droit civil: suivant le Code français. Tome II. Bruxelles, 1841. P. 248. 29. Carbonnier J. Droit civil: Les biens. Paris, 1969. P. 51. https://cours-de-droit.net/presentation-et-definition-du-droit-des-biens-a121603808/ 30. Frigo M. Cultural property v. cultural heritage: A “battle of concepts” in international law? // International Review of the Red Cross. June. 2004. Vol. 6. ¹ 854. P. 367–370. 31. Code du patrimoine / Version consolidée au 6 mars 2020. URL : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006074236 32. Morris I. I. The World of the Shining Prince: Court Life in Ancient Japan. 1994, page 197. 33. Gerasimova M. P. Obrazy veshchey v proizvedeniyakh Kavabaty Yasunari. / Veshch' v yaponskoy kul'ture / Sost. N. G. Anarina, E. M. D'yakonova. Moskva, 2003. S. 235–236. 34. Sey-Senagon. Zapiski u izgolov'ya. Per. so staroyaponskogo V. Markovoy. Predisl. i komment. V. Markovoy. Moskva, 1983 S. 195. 35. Rodriguez Morales L. Ley sobre Conservación de Monumentos Históricos y Artísticos y Bellezas Naturales, promulgada el 6 de abril de 1914 // Boletín de Monumentos Históricos. Tercera Época. Núm. 21. 2011. P. 207. 36. Zhuang Zhou / translated by Wong Gak. Kyiv, 2019. S. 63 37. Ibid. C. 83.
<< Íàçàä
