Tarasyuk Volodymyr

Yearly journal of scientific articles Pravova derzhava Volume 32 (2021),
505-514 p.

Tarasyuk Volodymyr. Elements of Political-Legal Development of Ukraine Strategy: Aspects of Actualization and Scholarly Comprehension

The unbalanced state apparatus in the conditions of the law enforcement system inaction and the chaotic actions of the authorities aimed at overcoming the crisis caused by the resistance of oligarchic capital eloquently testify to the need to implement systematic programs to restore and develop strategic directions of the state.

Strengthening and separating regional elites from the center weakens the role and discredits central governments; the loss of control over the strategic sectors of the economy monopolized by the oligarchs requires the government to constantly seek a compromise between the interests of the state and meet the needs of corrupt capital; lack of own (national) programs for the development of education and science, national security and defense, information policy led to the introduction of foreign ideas and concepts, sometimes outdated and sometimes irrelevant to modern Ukrainian conditions (for example, the introduction of restrictive economic instruments contribute to the destruction of countries, unable to provide their needs with their own resources at least 90%).

The constant reduction of financial, natural, and human resources has led to growing public discontent with the oligarchs who colonized Ukraine in the late 1990s and early 2000s and, depending on Russian markets, pursue their own mercantile interests contrary to state interests. 

Elite change is one of the most pressing and painful issues related to the restoration of subjectivity and statehood in the Ukrainian state. None of the previous mass protests, the Orange Revolution and the Revolution of Dignity, led to a change of elites as the primary, basic cause of mass discontent. Policy inclusiveness and economic monopolization do not help restore public confidence in government actions and decisions. Domestic elites are in one way or another closely connected (dependent) with oligarchic capital whether financial, political or media. Thus, Ukrainian elites can be confidently called pro-oligarchic, and oligarchs representatives of domestic elites.

The public demand for the de-elitization of the oligarchs has every reason to grow into another Maidan. In Ukraine, during the thirty years of independence, no conditions have been created for the professional realization of educators, scientists, doctors, journalists, engineers, etc. All so-called non-profit professions are in deep decline. Market relations have gradually transformed into market thinking a liberal economy turns us into a market society. When measuring education, medicine, politics, friendship or family relations according to the standards of market thinking the market suffers, and public relations, and education, medicine, science, politics, etc. none of these categories can be market by definition.

Key words: deoligarchization, corruption, civil society, state development strategy, education and science, national security and defense, information policy, state formation.


1. Andrushchenko V.P. Orhanizovane suspilstvo. Kyiv., 2006. [uk]. 2. Holovatyi M. Komu sluzhyt politychna elita? Personal. 2006. 21(172), 30 travnia. S. 3541 [uk] ; Holovatyi M. Politychna elita suchasnoi Ukrainy: rehionalnyi i natsio nalnyi kontekst. Politychnyi menedzhment. 2006. Spets. vypusk. S. 42 [uk] ; Holovatyi M. Poniattia politychna elita i politychnyi klas v konteksti suchasnoi politychnoi dumky. Politychnyi menedzhment. 2008. Spets. vypusk. S. 21. [uk]. 3. Horbach D. Evoliutsiia ukrainskoi politychnoi elity: vid partiinykh bosiv do bosiv velykoho biznesu. Naukovi zapysky IPiEND im. I.F.Kurasa NAN Ukrainy. 2003. T. 22. Ch. II. S. 196200. [uk]. 4. Berezhna I. Onovlennia politychnoi elity v Ukraini: nespodivanka obitsianoi ataky. Viche. 2010. 7. S. 45. [uk]. 5. Korniievskyi O. Hromadianske suspilstvo ta pravliacha elita: problemy vzaiemovidnosyn u suchasnii Ukraini. Stratehichni priorytety. 2014. Vyp. 3(32). S. 120. [uk]. 6. Kochubei L. Suchasni politychni elity ta politychnyi klas: vyznachennia, modeli ta osoblyvosti stanovlennia. Naukovi zapysky IPiEND im. I.F.Kurasa NAN Ukrainy. 2010. Vyp. 1(45). S. 51. [uk]. 7. Fesenko V. Yak zminyty yakist politychnoi elity Ukrainy? Lektsiia. 2012. 23 lystopada. URL : http://polit.ua/lectures/2012/02/28/fesenko.html [uk]. 8. Shulha M. Vladna elita. Viche. 2007. 8. S. 4855 [uk] ; Shulha M. Etapy stanovlennia politychnoi elity v Ukraini v roky nezalezhnosti. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketynh. 2006. Vyp. 4. S. 34. [uk]. 9. Barret Dzh. Protestiruite sebia. Sposobnosti, lichnost, motyvatsyia, karera. Sankt-Peterburh : Pyter, 2003. 254 s. [ru] ; Huzyk M.P. Kombinovana systema orhanizatsii navchalno-vykhovnoho protsesu v zahalnoosvitnii shkoli: dys. kand. ped. nauk. Kyiv., 2004. 230 s. [uk]. ; Ryzhov V.A. Professyonalnaia oryentatsyia y podhotovka kadrov v Velykobretanyy. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 1991. 159 s. [ru]. 10. Ukaz prezydenta Ukrainy 392/2020 Pro rishennia Rady natsionalnoi bezpeky i oborony Ukrainy vid 14 veresnia 2020 roku Pro Stratehiiu natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy. [uk].

<< Back