Batanov Oleksandr

Yearly journal of scientific articles Pravova derzhava
Volume 34 (2023), 278-290 p.

DOI: 10.33663/1563-3349-2023-34-278-290

Batanov Oleksandr. Constitutional-legal and socio-political problems of Ukrainian statehood: history and modernity

The article highlights the doctrinal and applied political and legal problems of the genesis and development of Ukrainian statehood in the context of todays challenges.It is proven that Ukrainian statehood is an inviolable requirement of the existence of the Ukrainian people and their sovereign will, the entire centuries-old history of Ukrainian statehood and the right to self-determination exercised by the Ukrainian nation, the entire Ukrainian people. This is a determining factor in strengthening civil harmony on the land of  Ukraine and the foundation of the national identity of  the Ukrainian people, national patriotic consciousness and spirituality. Preservation of the foundations of national statehood, protection of the state sovereignty of Ukraine, the integrity and inviolability of its territory determines the content and direction of the states foreign and domestic policy and is the object of Ukraines national security, the cause of the entire Ukrainian people.

The problems of the history, theory and practice of Ukrainian state-building in the conditions of full-scale armed aggression of the Russian Federation and the Russian-Ukrainian war are considered. It is proven that the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian state faced a number of complex systemic internal and external threats and challenges, primarily related to such fundamental constitutional values as sovereignty, independence, freedom, democracy, territorial integrity, etc. Parallels are drawn between the historical past and the present in the context of the relationship between Ukrainian statehood and Horde Muscovy.

It is proven that statehood is a broad, multi-structural concept that consists of various elements, one of which is the state. At the same time, statehood and the stateare concepts that do not coincide, they cannot be equated. The concept of statehood in the categorical apparatus of modern political and legal science performs a number of explanatory, axiological and identifying functions that reveal the substantive and formal-legal specificity of various stages of this process in the direction of the formation of a sovereign state and its institutions

The conceptual issues of the human dimension of  Ukrainian statehood, the strategy of its development through the prism of the realization and protection of human right sare considered. Attention is focused on the fundamental challenges of modernization of Ukrainian statehood from the standpoint of the principles of classical constitutionalism. Certain trends in the development of  Ukrainian statehood in the aspect of the formationof civil society in Ukraine, institutions of a social legal state, parliamentarism and implementation of power decentralization are outlined.

Key words: statehood, state, Ukrainian people, society, public power, democracy,constitutional reform.

References

1. Timothy Snyder. We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist. The New York Times. URL:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html?fbclid=IwAR1JXPWQ9sGjTwWpP_Z07fJLqLTRTT73dYiiwHHha0Nj_tKifZAH7ao_e7Y.

2. Jason Stanley. How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press.URL: https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691173429/how-propagandaworks.

3. Rashyzm: suchasnyi variant varvarstva (iurydychni aspekty problemy) [Racism: amodern version of barbarism (legal aspects of the problem)]: Vseukrainska naukovakonferentsiia (m. Kyiv, 25 travnia 2022 r.). Portal Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy.URL: https://www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Messages/Pages/View.aspx?MessageID=9125 [ukr.].

4. Pyrozhkov S. I. & Khamitov N. V. (2022) Viina i myr v Ukraini: shliakhy do realnoiperemohy i rozvytku [War and peace in Ukraine: ways to real victory and development].Visnyk NAN Ukrainy. 9 [ukr.]. 

5. Dugin A. G. (1997) Osnovy geopolitiki [Fundamentalsof geopolitics]. Moskva: Arktogeya [rus.]. 

6. Terliuk I. Ya. (2021) Ukrainska natsionalnaderzhavnist: formuvannia derzhavno-pravovoi tradytsii (druha polovyna XVI pochatokKhKh st.) [Ukrainian national statehood: the formation of the state-legal tradition (thesecond half of the 16th the beginning of the 20th century)]: avtoref. dys. ... d-ra yuryd.nauk: spets. 12.00.01. Lviv [ukr.]. 

7. Minchenko R. M. (2009)  Evoliutsiia derzhavnoi vladyv suchasnii Ukraini (teoretyko-pravove doslidzhennia) [Evolution of state power in modernUkraine (theoretical and legal research)]: avtoref. dys. d-ra yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.01.Kyiv [ukr.]. 

8. Boiko O. (2012) Derzhavnist [Statehood]. Politychna entsyklopediia. Redkol.: Yu. Levenets (holova), Yu. Shapoval (zast. holovy) ta in. Kyiv: Parlamentske vydvo[ukr.]. 

9. Shcherbinina O. O. (2011) Vzaiemozviazok suverenitetu ta yakisnykh parametriv derzhavnosti v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Interrelationship of sovereignty andqualitative parameters of statehood in the conditions of globalization]: avtoref. dys. kand.polit. nauk: spets. 23.00.02. Odesa [ukr.]. 

10. Renov Ye. V. (2017) Tsinnosti konstytutsiinoho ladu Ukrainy ta yikh pravova rehlamentatsiia [Values of the constitutional system of Ukraine and their legal regulation]: avtoref. dys. kand. yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.02.Kharkiv [ukr.]. 

11. Parkhomenko N. M. (2022) Derzhavnyi rezhym Rosiiskoi Federatsii:okremi polityko-pravovi vymiry [The state regime of the Russian Federation: separate political and legal dimensions]. Filosofski ta metodolohichni problemy prava. 1(23) [ukr.].

<< Back